On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:41:33AM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Jeff King wrote:
> > It's not that it's not potentially useful. It's that it may be
> > surprising and annoying to users who did not want that.
> Besides, I'm not able to imagine one scenario where this is the wrong
> or annoying thing to do. Can you provide an example?
To flesh out my earlier example:
$ git clone https://github.com/upstream/project.git
$ cd project
$ hack hack hack; commit commit commit
$ git tag -m 'something of note' my-tag
$ git remote add me https://github.com/me/project.git
$ git config branch.master.remote me
$ git tag -m 'something of note'
$ git push master my-tag
My intent there is publish both master and mytag, but my-tag goes to
origin. It's obvious if you think carefully about (and know) the rules,
and it's user error. But what fault do we take for designing a feature
that causes confusion?
Maybe I am the only one who might make that mistake, and it is a
non-issue. But I would be much happier if git said "hey, are you sure
you wanted to push to two different remotes?". At least by default.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html