Matthieu Moy wrote:
> No, they don't. Git forbids redefining commands with aliases. They may
> have an alias like "git pullauto" or so, but not "git pull".
Ofcourse, but you get the point. I use p for push, and pu for pull myself.
> There's not much we can do about it now, as Git cannot guess whether a
> stash is to be re-applied later or just kept "in case". My main use of
> "git stash" is "I want a reset --hard, but stash is safer", I wouldn't
> want "status" to remind me when I have a stash because it is almost
> always the case.
> Showing the "autostash" status in "git status" would make sense OTOH,
> but I agree that it's another topic.
If the HEAD of the stash contains a stash beginning with the message
"pull.autostash: ", show it in the status. End of story.
Anyway, no point arguing about this since we've decided not to pursue
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html