Matthieu Moy wrote: > No, they don't. Git forbids redefining commands with aliases. They may > have an alias like "git pullauto" or so, but not "git pull".
Ofcourse, but you get the point. I use p for push, and pu for pull myself. > There's not much we can do about it now, as Git cannot guess whether a > stash is to be re-applied later or just kept "in case". My main use of > "git stash" is "I want a reset --hard, but stash is safer", I wouldn't > want "status" to remind me when I have a stash because it is almost > always the case. > > Showing the "autostash" status in "git status" would make sense OTOH, > but I agree that it's another topic. If the HEAD of the stash contains a stash beginning with the message "pull.autostash: ", show it in the status. End of story. Anyway, no point arguing about this since we've decided not to pursue pull.autostash anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
