On 05/15/2013 08:03 PM, Eugene Sajine wrote:
> My primary goal was to understand better what are the real problems
> that we might have with the way we use git cvsimport, so I was not
> asking about the guarantee of the cvsimport to import things
> correctly, but if there is a guarantee the import will result in
> completely broken history.
So what are you going to do, use cvsimport whenever you cannot *prove*
that it is wrong? You sure have low standards for your software.
The only *useful* guarantee is that software is *correct* under defined
circumstances. I don't think anybody has gone to the trouble to figure
out when that claim can be made for cvsimport.
> If the cvsimport is that broken - is there any plan to fix it?
For one-time imports, the fix is to use a tool that is not broken, like
Alternatively, Eric Raymond claims to have developed a new version of
cvsps that is not quite as broken as the old version. Presumably
cvsimport would be not quite as broken if used with the new cvsps.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html