Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Depending on the nature of the change in question, it may match well
>> or worse to what you are trying to find out. When you are trying to
>> say "What were you smoking when you implemented this broken logic?",
>> using -C may be good, but when your question is "Even though all the
>> callers of this function live in that other file, somebody moved
>> this function that used to be file static in that file to here and
>> made it public. Why?", you do not want to use -C.
>> I am reasonably sure that in the finished code later in the series
>> it will become configurable, but a fallback default is better to be
>> not so expensive one.
> The script's purpose is to find related commits, -CCC does that, does it not?
As I already said in the above, the answer is no, when you are
trying to find who moved the code from the original place.
>> Makes sense to start from the preimage so that you can find out who
>> wrote the original block of lines your patch is removing.
>> But then if source is /dev/null, wouldn't you be able to stop
>> without running blame at all? You know the patch is creating a new
>> file at that point and there is nobody to point a finger at.
> A patch can touch multiple files.
What line range would you be feeding "blame" with, for such a file
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html