On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>   http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/225969

This is a good example of an evolving discussion. René Scharfe has
accepted that the API indeed needs work. How exactly it's going to be
fixed is not entirely clear, but at least there's a patch that
essentially tackles what I tried to tackle.

So it's good for the users.

>>   http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/226125

This also evolved rather nicely, since there is discussion about
exactly how the signals should be presented to Windows users, because
it's clear currently most of the codes only work in Linux.

Again, users benefit from this.

>>   http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/223279

Unfortunately nobody took the charge on this ones, so we will remain
forever in a non-ideal situation.

It's not my fault though. I sent the patch that fixes the problem, and
there's only so much I can do.

Not that it matters much, because the important patches were applied.

But what does this have to do with anything? How are you helping the
Git project by bringing this up? How does this help our users?

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to