On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2013-06-09 13:01:30 -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >> You don't agree that 1) a collegial work environment is overrated, 2)
>> >> that the Linux kernel doesn't put an emphasis on being collegial, or
>> >> 3) that it's the most successful software project in history?
>> > Point 1.
>> Good, so we agree that a project doesn't need a collegial work
>> environment to be extremely and amazingly successful. In fact, any
>> rational person would keep an open mind to the fact that perhaps it
>> actually _helps_ to not have such environment, based on the evidence.
> Just from skimming both lists, most of the time I find lkml to be nicer
> (and more collegial) to read because it has a better atmosphere than
> git@ had in the last year or two.
A better atmosphere, yes, because they know how to avoid flamewars,
and concentrate on technical issues, not because they have a collegial
Unless you think this reply is collegial. Even though I haven't
been following Linux mailing lists that closely lately, I still manage
to see a lot of these kinds of replies.
> And yes, a good atmosphere plays an important role. One of the reasons
> is that it makes it easier to discern arguments based on personality
> disputes - which certainly exist on lk - from actual technical
> disagreements that need to be resolved.
That's right, but that's not because everyone is collegial in LKML,
which they most certainly are not. Linus being one of many examples.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html