Antoine Pelisse <apeli...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Stefan Beller
> <stefanbel...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> builtin/repack.c | 410
>> contrib/examples/git-repack.sh | 194 +++++++++++++++++++
>> git-repack.sh | 194 -------------------
> I'm still not sure I understand the trade-off here.
> Most of what git-repack does is compute some file paths, (re)move
> those files and call git-pack-objects, and potentially
> git-prune-packed and git-update-server-info.
> Maybe I'm wrong, but I have the feeling that the correct tool for that
> is Shell, rather than C (and I think the code looks less intuitive in
> C for that matter).
> I'm not sure anyone would run that command a thousand times a second,
> so I'm not sure it would make a real-life performance difference.
I do not think the motivation of this patch is about performance in
the first place, though.
> Last and very less important: I think it's OK to format-patch with -M,
> especially when you move a file.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html