Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Matthieu Moy
> <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
>> Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
>>> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>>>> Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
>>> Ideally, it would be possible to ask for a non-update without a fatal
>>> error on old Git versions, but this is not possible (hence, my fix is
>>> the "portable" one, that works on Git 1.8.4).
>>> But that's probably the best we can do now.
>> ... and a patch implementing that would look like:
> This is exactly what I meant by only update when a feature has been
> flagged.

OK, I didn't understand you meant patching Git itself for that. So it
makes sense to turn my toy patch into a real patch I guess. Any comment
on the capability name? I used dont-update-private, which is a bit long.
The actual precise name would be dont-update-private-for-push, but
that's really long. Any better idea?

Just to be sure: you originally wrote "update the remote namespace only
when a certain feature has been flagged". My patch differs in two ways:
it's opt-out, not opt-in, and it's about updating the _private_
namespace, not the remote. Any comment on what's the best behavior?

Matthieu Moy
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to