Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Sebastian Schuberth <sschube...@gmail.com> writes:
> > For custom builds of Git it sometimes is inconvenient to annotate tags
> > because there simply is nothing to say, so do not require an annotation.
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sschube...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> Hmmmm, personally I'd actually want this to stay the way it is, or
> even require a valid signed tag, in order to make sure I won't
> mistakenly creating a lightweight tag.
So the only user Git should care about is you? If Git can make _you_ more
confortable not making certain mistakes, then that's the way it should be?
What's the point of lightweight tags anyway? 'git describe' doesn't use them,
GIT-VERSION-GEN neither, just remove them already.
For the vast majority of the people out there, a tag is a tag. Period.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html