On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:51:04PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jeff King wrote:
> > I am not _that_ bothered by the "known breakage", but AFAICT there is
> > zero benefit to keeping this redundant test.
> Devil's advocate: it ensures that anyone wrapping git's tests (like
> the old smoketest infrastructure experiment) is able to handle an
> expected failure.
Thanks. One of the things I love about open source is that as soon as I
say "I can't see how...", the answer is crowd-sourced for me. :)
That being said, even if the test has a non-zero possible value...
> But in practice I don't mind the behavior before or after this patch.
> If the test harness is that broken, we'll know. And people writing
> code that wraps git's tests can write their own custom sanity-checks.
...I think for these reasons that the value is smaller than the
disruption caused by the test, and the patch is a net win.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html