Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> In that case I think git-compat-util.h should include something like
>> what block-sha1/sha1.c has:
>> #if !defined(__i386__) && !defined(__x86_64__) && \
>> !defined(_M_IX86) && !defined(_M_X64) && \
>> !defined(__ppc__) && !defined(__ppc64__) && \
>> !defined(__powerpc__) && !defined(__powerpc64__) && \
>> !defined(__s390__) && !defined(__s390x__)
>> #define NEEDS_ALIGNED_ACCESS
>> Otherwise we are relying on the person building to know their own
>> architecture intimately, which shouldn't be necessary.
> Yeah, I agree it would be nice to autodetect.
The nice thing is that false positives are harmless, modulo slowing
down git a little if the compiler doesn't figure out how to optimize
the NEEDS_ALIGNED_ACCESS codepath when on an unlisted platform that
doesn't, in fact, need aligned access.
In other words, it would work out of the box for everybody.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html