Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:

> Matthieu Moy wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Commit 26cd160 (rebase -i: use a better reflog message) tried to produce
>> > a better reflog message, however, it seems a statement was introduced by
>> > mistake.
>> >
>> > 'comment_for_reflog start' basically overides the GIT_REFLOG_ACTION we
>> > just set.
>> So, one needs to reset $GIT_REFLOG_ACTION to what it used to be if is it
>> to be used later. However, it seems to me that the "comment_for_reflog
>> start" is used only for this checkout command. If so, there's no need
>> for the "comment_for_reflog start" before the if statement either.
> Exactly. But if this variable is only meant for this command, it should be
> `VAR=VAL command`, that would make it clear without the need of a comment.

I don't understand. Are you suggesting to replace the shell function
"output" with an external command? If not, which command would you want
to call here?

Matthieu Moy
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to