Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Matthieu Moy wrote:
> >> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
> >> > Commit 26cd160 (rebase -i: use a better reflog message) tried to produce
> >> > a better reflog message, however, it seems a statement was introduced by
> >> > mistake.
> >> >
> >> > 'comment_for_reflog start' basically overides the GIT_REFLOG_ACTION we
> >> > just set.
> >> So, one needs to reset $GIT_REFLOG_ACTION to what it used to be if is it
> >> to be used later. However, it seems to me that the "comment_for_reflog
> >> start" is used only for this checkout command. If so, there's no need
> >> for the "comment_for_reflog start" before the if statement either.
> > Exactly. But if this variable is only meant for this command, it should be
> > `VAR=VAL command`, that would make it clear without the need of a comment.
> I don't understand. Are you suggesting to replace the shell function
> "output" with an external command? If not, which command would you want
> to call here?
Recently some code was changed to do 'test_must_fail env VAR=VAL command', why
can't we do the same?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html