Matthieu Moy wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes: > > Matthieu Moy wrote: > >> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> > Commit 26cd160 (rebase -i: use a better reflog message) tried to produce > >> > a better reflog message, however, it seems a statement was introduced by > >> > mistake. > >> > > >> > 'comment_for_reflog start' basically overides the GIT_REFLOG_ACTION we > >> > just set. > > > >> So, one needs to reset $GIT_REFLOG_ACTION to what it used to be if is it > >> to be used later. However, it seems to me that the "comment_for_reflog > >> start" is used only for this checkout command. If so, there's no need > >> for the "comment_for_reflog start" before the if statement either. > > > > Exactly. But if this variable is only meant for this command, it should be > > `VAR=VAL command`, that would make it clear without the need of a comment. > > I don't understand. Are you suggesting to replace the shell function > "output" with an external command? If not, which command would you want > to call here?
Recently some code was changed to do 'test_must_fail env VAR=VAL command', why can't we do the same? -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
