James Denholm <nod.h...@gmail.com> writes:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>David Lang wrote:
>>> the vast majority of people here do not take that attitude.
>>It's actually the exact opposite. I don't care what is the track record
>>of the people in the discussion.
> Ah, yes, like that discussion we once had where you totally
> didn't run `git log | grep James Denholm` at one point to demonstrate
> that I had not yet made any
> contributions,instead of actually engaging in discussion. Oh,
It's called an "ad hominem attack", and it's a very common and very
effective rhetorical device.
> The problem, though, is that time and time again you've
> shown that you value your own arguments to the exclusion
> of all others. You can't tell if someone else's argument is
> good, because it runs against yours, and yours must be
> right because you hold it.
If he considered others capable of independent thought, would he call
out their imperviousness to rhetorics as a deficiency?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html