Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > ... >> I was originally led to believe that its code quality was good >> enough, and that was why I merged the bottom three patches of the >> series even down to 'next' in the first place. But after seeing the >> "Of course" response that led to [*1*], which made me recall many >> patch-review interactions with him, I have started to have doubts. > > This is bullshit, and a wrong direction fallacy. > > Event #1: > Junio rejects the graduation > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/248263 > > Event #2: > I give up improving remote helpers in git.git > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/248063/focus=248341 > > Junio is trying to make you believe that his decision (#1) was caused by > something I did (#2). Don't fall into that trap, #2 happened *AFTER* #1, > it can't possibly be the cause.
I think you misunderstood. I never said that I do not want it to graduate up (out is an option) based on code quality. In fact, I do not think anybody discussed about code quality until this morning. But because I was asked, I thought about it, and then answered honestly. I do not know what a trap you perceive is about, and I am not interested in your responses. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
