On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:32:45AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Junio, we should consider a v2.0.4 with that series, I think. This is a
> > pretty serious regression in diff-tree (I didn't even realize that the
> > buffer-slab work went into the maint series; that may have been a little
> > ambitious).
> Or v2.0.4 without that series, which is how we usually do things,
> but let me see if jk/alloc-commit-id is easily applicable there
> first.

Yeah, I'm fine with a straight revert, too (I think it is fine to keep
in master, though). I think jk/alloc-commit-id is built right on top of
the original commit-slab topic, so it should be easy to do either way.

Thanks for dealing with it.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to