On 20/04/16 19:41, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Elia Pinto <gitter.spi...@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Elia Pinto (3):
>>   git.txt: document the new GIT_TRACE_CURL environment variable
>>   imap-send.c: introduce the GIT_TRACE_CURL enviroment variable
>>   http.c: implements the GIT_TRACE_CURL environment variable
> 
> I think 2 & 3 need to be swapped; otherwise 2 would refer to
> yet-to-be-invented curl_trace() function, and break the build
> without 3, no?
> 
> Strictly speaking 1 should come at the end for the same reason, as
> setting GIT_TRACE_CURL after seeing that commit would not give users
> anything new.

Yep, I was just about to send an email saying that the patches should
be in the exact opposite order! (ie. 1->3 and 3->1) That is *if* you
want to keep them as a series. I would squash them into one patch ...

> Other than that, I didn't find anything blatantly wrong ;-).  Will
> nitpick individual patches later but I expect that it would be
> sufficient to locally tweak while queuing without rerolling.

I have one small issue ... 

ATB,
Ramsay Jones


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to