michaelpearce-gain commented on a change in pull request #3049: ARTEMIS-2681 
timestamp not set on notif msgs
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3049#discussion_r398212978
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/management/SecurityNotificationTest.java
 ##########
 @@ -155,6 +163,8 @@ public void testCONSUMER_CREATED() throws Exception {
       Assert.assertEquals("guest", 
notifications[0].getObjectProperty(ManagementHelper.HDR_VALIDATED_USER).toString());
       Assert.assertEquals(address.toString(), 
notifications[0].getObjectProperty(ManagementHelper.HDR_ADDRESS).toString());
       Assert.assertEquals(SimpleString.toSimpleString("unavailable"), 
notifications[0].getSimpleStringProperty(ManagementHelper.HDR_CERT_SUBJECT_DN));
+      Assert.assertTrue(notifications[0].getTimestamp() >= start);
+      Assert.assertTrue((Long) 
notifications[0].getObjectProperty(ManagementHelper.HDR_NOTIFICATION_TIMESTAMP) 
>= start);
 
 Review comment:
   i think the point here, is shouldnt the test be check timestamp >= start, 
and check timestamp aloing with hdr notif timestamp field are the same.
   
   current logic in test doesnt check both are the same.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to