jbonofre commented on PR #1364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1364#issuecomment-2536180353

   I agree with Chris. I think it makes more sense to close to the ActiveMQ 
async behavior (that exists for a while) more than trying to implement the spec 
at 100%. It would not surprise users imho ;)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: gitbox-h...@activemq.apache.org
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to