difin commented on code in PR #5540:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/5540#discussion_r1932768447


##########
iceberg/iceberg-handler/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/mr/hive/compaction/IcebergQueryCompactor.java:
##########
@@ -62,20 +63,32 @@ public boolean run(CompactorContext context) throws 
IOException, HiveException,
     Table icebergTable = IcebergTableUtil.getTable(conf, table.getTTable());
     String compactionQuery;
     String orderBy = ci.orderByClause == null ? "" : ci.orderByClause;
+    String fileSizeCond = null;
+
+    if (ci.type == CompactionType.MINOR) {

Review Comment:
   I don't think it is worth currently, because the only difference between 
minor and major compaction is that minor compaction adds files size threshold 
to compaction query. Maybe it make sense to do in the refactor PR where we 
implement compaction QueryBuilder
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@hive.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@hive.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: gitbox-h...@hive.apache.org

Reply via email to