github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] feat: Add Spark-compatible `xxhash64` and `murmur3` hash functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Spark-compatible `xxhash64` and `murmur3` hash functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Spark-compatible `xxhash64` and `murmur3` hash functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Spark-compatible `xxhash64` and `murmur3` hash functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Spark-compatible `xxhash64` and `murmur3` hash functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Spark-compatible `xxhash64` and `murmur3` hash functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Spark-compatible `xxhash64` and `murmur3` hash functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Spark-compatible `xxhash64` and `murmur3` hash functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Spark-compatible `xxhash64` and `murmur3` hash functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add Spark-compatible `xxhash64` and `murmur3` hash functions [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: implement metrics for AsyncFuncExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement metrics for AsyncFuncExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement metrics for AsyncFuncExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement metrics for AsyncFuncExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement metrics for AsyncFuncExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement metrics for AsyncFuncExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump tokio from 1.48.0 to 1.49.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump tokio from 1.47.1 to 1.48.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump tokio from 1.47.1 to 1.48.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Extract `execution_graph` extract to a trait [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Speedup accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `Nullstate` / accumulators [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Bug detecting datatype in VALUES tuples [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Bug detecting datatype in VALUES tuples [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use code points instead of grapheme clusters for string functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use code points instead of grapheme clusters for string functions [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TEST] Add avg_to_sum optimizer [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TPCH q1 with no predicates is 2x slower than duckdb [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TPCH q1 with no predicates is 2x slower than duckdb [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TPCH q1 with no predicates is 2x slower than duckdb [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Optimize `lower()/upper()` string function with ASCII fast path [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize `lower()/upper()` string function with ASCII fast path [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Implement metrics for `AsyncFuncExec` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement metrics for `AsyncFuncExec` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove coalesce batches rule and deprecate CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] feat: plan-time SQL expression simplifying [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support cast from HEX to FixedSizeBinary [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support cast from HEX to FixedSizeBinary [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] make DefaultLogicalExtensionCodec support serialisation of build in file formats [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Improve scale support for binary decimal operations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve scale support for binary decimal operations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve scale support for binary decimal operations [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] How to write csv file to disk from a empty dataframe? [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump testcontainers-modules from 0.13.0 to 0.14.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump testcontainers-modules from 0.13.0 to 0.14.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump testcontainers-modules from 0.13.0 to 0.14.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: bump testcontainers-modules to 0.14 and remove testcontainers dep [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: bump testcontainers-modules to 0.14 and remove testcontainers dep [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(accumulators): preserve state in evaluate() for window frame queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(accumulators): preserve state in evaluate() for window frame queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(accumulators): preserve state in evaluate() for window frame queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(accumulators): preserve state in evaluate() for window frame queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(accumulators): preserve state in evaluate() for window frame queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(accumulators): preserve state in evaluate() for window frame queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(accumulators): preserve state in evaluate() for window frame queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(accumulators): preserve state in evaluate() for window frame queries [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix TopK aggregation for UTF-8/Utf8View group keys and add safe fallback for unsupported string aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK aggregation for UTF-8/Utf8View group keys and add safe fallback for unsupported string aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK aggregation for UTF-8/Utf8View group keys and add safe fallback for unsupported string aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK aggregation for UTF-8/Utf8View group keys and add safe fallback for unsupported string aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK aggregation for UTF-8/Utf8View group keys and add safe fallback for unsupported string aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK aggregation for UTF-8/Utf8View group keys and add safe fallback for unsupported string aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK aggregation for UTF-8/Utf8View group keys and add safe fallback for unsupported string aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx from 8.2.3 to 9.0.4 in /docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx from 8.2.3 to 9.0.4 in /docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx from 8.2.3 to 9.0.4 in /docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx from 8.2.3 to 9.0.4 in /docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump sphinx from 8.2.3 to 9.0.4 in /docs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add support for schema-scoped table functions [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Allow log with non-integer base on decimals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Allow log with non-integer base on decimals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Allow log with non-integer base on decimals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Allow log with non-integer base on decimals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Allow log with non-integer base on decimals [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] [EPIC] Complete DML Support (MERGE, INSERT OVERWRITE, TRUNCATE) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Complete DML Support (MERGE, INSERT OVERWRITE, TRUNCATE) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Complete DML Support (MERGE, INSERT OVERWRITE, TRUNCATE) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Complete DML Support (MERGE, INSERT OVERWRITE, TRUNCATE) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Make GenericDistinctBuffer generic over both Hashable and native types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Make GenericDistinctBuffer generic over both Hashable and native types [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Improve error message in `sqllogictest` with `<slt:ignore>` marker [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix: fix spill oom for sort [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(spark): Use wrapping addition/subtraction in `SparkDateAdd` and `SparkDateSub` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): Use wrapping addition/subtraction in `SparkDateAdd` and `SparkDateSub` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): Use wrapping addition/subtraction in `SparkDateAdd` and `SparkDateSub` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Improve error message in sqllogictest with `<slt:ignore>` marker [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve error message in sqllogictest with `<slt:ignore>` marker [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve error message in sqllogictest with `<slt:ignore>` marker [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Improve memory accounting for cursor in external sort [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Deduplicate PhysicalExpr on proto ser/de using Arc pointer addresses [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Continue to improve performance of `trim` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Skip more workflows on benchmark PRs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Skip more workflows on benchmark PRs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Skip more workflows on benchmark PRs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] table scoped lfc [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] table scoped lfc [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] table scoped lfc [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] table scoped lfc [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] table scoped lfc [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] table scoped lfc [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Remove deprecated `Sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove deprecated `Sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove deprecated `Sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `substrait_plan` and remove deprecated `sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `substrait_plan` and remove deprecated `sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `substrait_plan` and remove deprecated `sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `substrait_plan` and remove deprecated `sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `substrait_plan` and remove deprecated `sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `substrait_plan` and remove deprecated `sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `substrait_plan` and remove deprecated `sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `substrait_plan` and remove deprecated `sql` field from `ExecuteQueryParams.Query` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages