> not syntax-based, which you don't currently like for type names: how would it > really be different here?
Not much different really, the problem is semantics, not syntax. And thats the problem with all the options. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1231#issuecomment-247293114