> I kind of did ignore it, because as I understood what he meant was to use > `g_error()` or alike and crash Geany, which sounded kind of harsh/insane. > This was possibly a misunderstanding on my part though.
Fair point. Maybe a more clear comment on why you thought it was a bad idea, or why @kugel- thought it was could have made things clearer. But well, it's harder to see how other will understand us, that's for sure. > Since it was such a trivial patch and the number of people who will encounter > this code path so small, I figured I'd just make an "executive decision" so > to speak. Which does make sense, otherwise if nobody "feels strongly" nothing ever happens. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1212#issuecomment-247567583
