@b4n commented on this pull request.


> @@ -906,7 +906,12 @@ static gint sort_found_tags(gconstpointer a, 
> gconstpointer b, gpointer user_data
         * followed by workspace tags,
         * followed by global tags */
        if (t1->type & tm_tag_local_var_t && t2->type & tm_tag_local_var_t)
-               return info->sort_by_name ? g_strcmp0(t1->name, t2->name) : 
t2->line - t1->line;
+       {
+               if (info->sort_by_name)
+                       return g_strcmp0(t1->name, t2->name);
+               else /* just like (t2->line - t1->line), but doesn't overflow 
converting to int */
+                       return (t2->line > t1->line) ? 1 : (t2->line < 
t1->line) ? -1 : 0;

Fixed in a follow-up commit that will need to be squashed.

The other solution could be to be explicit:
```diff
diff --git a/src/tagmanager/tm_workspace.c b/src/tagmanager/tm_workspace.c
index 32fc36f05..6252ddd25 100644
--- a/src/tagmanager/tm_workspace.c
+++ b/src/tagmanager/tm_workspace.c
@@ -909,8 +909,13 @@ static gint sort_found_tags(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer 
b, gpointer user_data
        {
                if (info->sort_by_name)
                        return g_strcmp0(t1->name, t2->name);
-               else /* just like (t2->line - t1->line), but doesn't overflow 
converting to int */
-                       return (t2->line > t1->line) ? 1 : (t2->line < 
t1->line) ? -1 : 0;
+               /* just like (t2->line - t1->line), but doesn't overflow 
converting to int */
+               else if (t2->line > t1->line)
+                       return 1;
+               else if (t2->line < t1->line)
+                       return -1;
+               else
+                       return 0;
        }
        else if (t1->type & tm_tag_local_var_t)
                return -1;
```
I'm not sure the verbosity is worth it though.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3665#discussion_r1380830903
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3665/review/[email protected]>

Reply via email to