> Now thinking, instead of `name`, shouldn't rather `GeanyPlugin *` be passed > as an argument of `register()`? The function can read from it whatever it > wants.
I thought of it, but I don't know… on one hand it indeed allows accessing a lot more stuff if need be, and we could even make sure the extension got unregistered on plugin unload (so a plugin forgetting to unregister wouldn't crash, although I wouldn't love authors to disregard deregistration), but it also means that it's not possible to discriminate several extensions registered by a single plugin, which might (or might not) be an issue for e.g. Peasy-based plugins (not that I can tell whether this API is Peasy-friendly to begin with). -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3849#issuecomment-2161517981 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3849/[email protected]>
