liukun4515 commented on code in PR #4741:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4741#discussion_r1058277985


##########
datafusion/expr/src/type_coercion/binary.rs:
##########
@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ fn temporal_coercion(lhs_type: &DataType, rhs_type: 
&DataType) -> Option<DataTyp
         },
         (Timestamp(_, tz), Utf8) => Some(Timestamp(TimeUnit::Nanosecond, 
tz.clone())),
         (Utf8, Timestamp(_, tz)) => Some(Timestamp(TimeUnit::Nanosecond, 
tz.clone())),
+        // TODO: need to investigate the result type for the comparison 
between timestamp and date

Review Comment:
   I try the comparison timestamp with date in the Spark, and find the coerced 
type is timestamp.
   
   ```
   spark-sql> explain extended select now()>cast('2000-01-01' as date);
   == Parsed Logical Plan ==
   'Project [unresolvedalias(('now() > cast(2000-01-01 as date)), None)]
   +- OneRowRelation
   
   == Analyzed Logical Plan ==
   (now() > CAST(2000-01-01 AS DATE)): boolean
   Project [(now() > cast(cast(2000-01-01 as date) as timestamp)) AS (now() > 
CAST(2000-01-01 AS DATE))#49]
   +- OneRowRelation
   
   == Optimized Logical Plan ==
   Project [true AS (now() > CAST(2000-01-01 AS DATE))#49]
   +- OneRowRelation
   
   == Physical Plan ==
   *(1) Project [true AS (now() > CAST(2000-01-01 AS DATE))#49]
   +- *(1) Scan OneRowRelation[]
   ```
   
   
   cc @comphead @alamb 
   
   But current implementation of coerced type is date, we can fix this in the 
follow up PR.
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to