zeroshade commented on PR #34331: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/34331#issuecomment-1444234348
@srebhan from the arrow side it's more of a maintenance question. it's hard to justify maintaining two separate implementations. The ADBC FlightSQL driver is basically a thin wrapper around the FlightSQL client already and the `adbc/sqldriver` package shouldn't be adding much in the way of overhead (honestly I'd be surprised if any overhead it adds dwarfs the actual network IO costs....). At a minimum we should document the use case, either through your work here or by documenting how to leverage ADBC's flight sql driver. Just as a thought, would you be able to create a benchmark that uses `database/sql` against IOx that we can run with both of your solution here and the ADBC driver so we can compare and see if there's a significant difference (thus justifying the separate implementation)? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
