vertexclique commented on pull request #8664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8664#issuecomment-733737357


   > Conceptually this is not a small change. Personally I think parallelizing 
on the datafusion level and keeping kernels single-threaded is the better model.
   
   I don't think personally, I am experimenting and working on that based on 
proofs. It is not a better model, even Intel says that. So there is still no 
conflict for further parallelizing in the DataFusion (which is already done via 
reactor). We are using arrow in the company. and yet still, we haven't 
parallelized chunks which is also wrong in many directions.
   
   > The benchmark is now also testing a much larger array (2^20 elements) than 
what is usually used as a chunk size, so in reality the speedup due to 
parallelism would be much smaller.
   
   There are no predetermined chunk sizes and benchmarks shouldn't work on 
cache fittable data at all. That's against the benchmarking rule. Otherwise, 
you don't see the actual processing time, at all. Moreover, if this data format 
can't process large data on demand, there is no point in having this data 
format. (Users will think like that even I don't, which is also the most valid 
thing out there.) Also please don't alter my comments/words or use them against 
the pr.
   
   Please also stop undermining others' work and be honest about what has been 
done. I have already told you to do this way but you preferred sharing raw 
pointers in an unsafe context, which won't and never ever going to be 
parallelized without a full rewrite. This is that full rewrite.
   
   Finally, It is entirely unethical and dishonest to open PRs that I 
told/taught to you. I am not your rival, I don't see myself as a rival to 
anyone in any form, because there is no rivalry. This is an open-source 
environment. I don't see goodwill from your comments too. Also, some of your 
comments are giving false information (which I stopped giving feedback). I 
prefer instead of having counterproductive comments, productive comments from 
you. Even I told this plenty of times seems like that's not going to happen. 
So, please don't comment and review my PRs. Thanks.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to