paleolimbot commented on PR #702: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/702#issuecomment-1561726336
> For here: we could wrap the stream in a new stream that delegates to the original, and keeps a strong reference to the Python object? I wonder if you'd want the stream to take full ownership of the statement (if it was exported via `__arrow_c_stream__()`). Leaving the destruction of the statement up to the garbage collector can be sort of a pain (I've gotten a lot of "connection busy" errors while trying to get the lifecycles right in R). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
