comphead commented on PR #8193:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/8193#issuecomment-1821930943

   > Seems reasonable to me -- thank you @comphead. Does this revert the 
behavior added to close #2979 (to align with postgres behavior?) Or does it 
just change to_timestamp to return a type of TimestampNanos (though the 
argument is still interpreted as `seconds`)?
   > 
   > -- @waitingkuo do you have a few moments to give this PR a look?
   
   It doesn't revert the behavior, the input still treated as seconds,  but the 
return type is nanoseconds to keep DataFusion consistent with all timestamp 
arithmetics and functions.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to