paleolimbot commented on PR #406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/pull/406#issuecomment-2010599091
> The example code here is an expanded version of what's in the CMake
minimal example
This is OK, but I wonder if just:
```
int main() {
return ArrowNanoarrowCheckRuntime();
}
```
...would be sufficient to check what you've written here. We can always
expand the example later but I think keeping it relevant to the includes and
symbols at hand is probably best.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
