nealrichardson commented on a change in pull request #9606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9606#discussion_r589770069
##########
File path: r/tests/testthat/test-Array.R
##########
@@ -723,6 +723,17 @@ test_that("[ accepts Arrays and otherwise handles bad
input", {
)
})
+test_that("[ %in% looks up string key in dictionary", {
+ a1 <- Array$create(as.factor(c("A", "B", "C")))
+ a2 <- DictionaryArray$create(c(0L, 1L, 2L), c(4.5, 3.2, 1.1))
+ b1 <- Array$create(c(FALSE, TRUE, FALSE))
+ b2 <- Array$create(c(FALSE, FALSE, FALSE))
+ expect_equal(b1, arrow:::call_function("is_in_meta_binary", a1,
Array$create("B")))
+ expect_equal(b2, arrow:::call_function("is_in_meta_binary", a1,
Array$create("D")))
+ expect_equal(b1, arrow:::call_function("is_in_meta_binary", a2,
Array$create(3.2)))
+ expect_error(arrow:::call_function("is_in_meta_binary", a2,
Array$create("B")))
Review comment:
@jonkeane reminds me that `%in%` isn't an option here due to R's method
dispatch quirks. So what I suggested won't work.
In that case, keep these as they are, but (1) drop the `arrow:::` (not
needed in the test suite, it evals in the package namespace) and (2) switch the
order of arguments so that the expected result is second.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
