rok commented on a change in pull request #9606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9606#discussion_r589811906
##########
File path: r/tests/testthat/test-Array.R
##########
@@ -723,6 +723,17 @@ test_that("[ accepts Arrays and otherwise handles bad
input", {
)
})
+test_that("[ %in% looks up string key in dictionary", {
+ a1 <- Array$create(as.factor(c("A", "B", "C")))
+ a2 <- DictionaryArray$create(c(0L, 1L, 2L), c(4.5, 3.2, 1.1))
+ b1 <- Array$create(c(FALSE, TRUE, FALSE))
+ b2 <- Array$create(c(FALSE, FALSE, FALSE))
+ expect_equal(b1, arrow:::call_function("is_in_meta_binary", a1,
Array$create("B")))
+ expect_equal(b2, arrow:::call_function("is_in_meta_binary", a1,
Array$create("D")))
+ expect_equal(b1, arrow:::call_function("is_in_meta_binary", a2,
Array$create(3.2)))
+ expect_error(arrow:::call_function("is_in_meta_binary", a2,
Array$create("B")))
Review comment:
I was just about to ask about this. @jonkeane told me about this quirk.
I've proposed a new
[`is_in`](https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9606/files#diff-9d33f036186210a1076f3adc590e0cc60a0b65556cefdbd15e6d26aa105f7d76R120)
function. If it doesn't make sense for consistency we can scrap it.
Is there a plan to create aliases for calling call_function at some point?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
