lidavidm commented on PR #455: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/455#issuecomment-3161939276
Just chiming in as an arrow-go (but not parquet) contributor: I find the idea of test cases that are invalid and yet presented as real test cases rather unsettling; it feels like implementation- or vendor- specific behavior snuck its way in to what is supposed to be the official spec. > We definitely want read behavior to be predictable and have consistent behavior. If the desired consistent behavior isn't actually written into the spec, how would one know what that behavior should be? I think this is the crux of the issue: if Parquet does want to allow slightly out-of-spec files to be read it needs to be clearly defined in the spec -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
