rmnskb commented on PR #48085: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/48085#issuecomment-3518285148
> Sorry for late reply @rmnskb. I think all dunders that semantically map to our existing kernels are fair game! I'm not sure what these would be, but the set you have now looks decently sized. Ok, I was also thinking about covering as many dunder methods as possible, but did not want to go out of scope for this issue. > We might be able to add docstrings via type annotations. Or perhaps it's possible to copy them at runtime from the respective kernels? (unsure that is possible). In any case we probably don't want to duplicate docstrings in general. Copying the docstrings sounds like a good idea, I will look further into that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
