daniel-adam-tfs commented on PR #596: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/596#issuecomment-3739762188
I've generated myself 8 files, 4 using arrow-go and 4 using PyArrow with this configuration: 1. V1 Data Page, uncompressed 2. V1 Data Page, snappy compressed 3. V2 Data Page, uncompressed 4. V2 Data Page, snappy compressed PyArrow successfully reads all 8 of them. For arrow-go the V2+uncompressed fails in both versions, that is the issue we discovered in the related memory PR. However interestingly 4) generated by PyArrow also fails. I'll investigate tomorrow. I'm also thinking about maybe a test docker container to test PyArrow <-> arrow-go compatibility. Or are there some other integration tests done in some other way that I missed? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
