lostluck commented on a change in pull request #11257: [BEAM-3301] Create runtime invokers for SDF methods. URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11257#discussion_r400394073
########## File path: sdks/go/pkg/beam/core/runtime/exec/sdf_invokers.go ########## @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more +// contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with +// this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. +// The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 +// (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with +// the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +// +// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +// +// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software +// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, +// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. +// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +// limitations under the License. + +package exec + +import ( + "github.com/apache/beam/sdks/go/pkg/beam/core/funcx" + "github.com/apache/beam/sdks/go/pkg/beam/core/sdf" + "github.com/apache/beam/sdks/go/pkg/beam/core/util/reflectx" + "github.com/apache/beam/sdks/go/pkg/beam/internal/errors" + "reflect" +) + +func invokeCreateInitialRestriction(fn *funcx.Fn, elms *FullValue) (rest interface{}, err error) { + if fn == nil { + return nil, nil + } + + switch fnT := fn.Fn.(type) { + case reflectx.Func1x1: + return fnT.Call1x1(elms.Elm), nil + case reflectx.Func2x1: + return fnT.Call2x1(elms.Elm, elms.Elm2), nil + default: + var inputs []interface{} + switch fn.Fn.Type().NumIn() { + case 1: + inputs = []interface{}{elms.Elm} + case 2: + inputs = []interface{}{elms.Elm, elms.Elm2} + default: + err := errors.Errorf("fn %v has unexpected number of inputs: %v", fn.Fn.Name(), fn.Fn.Type().NumIn()) + return nil, errors.WithContext(err, "sdf CreateInitialRestriction invoker") + } + rets := fn.Fn.Call(inputs) + return rets[0], nil + } +} + +func invokeSplitRestriction(fn *funcx.Fn, elms *FullValue, rest interface{}) ([]interface{}, error) { Review comment: It occurs to me that we don't seem to have the abstract signatures documented for the "Provider" methods like SplitRestriction. IIRC we avoided doing that for now to avoid accidental usage? It might be good to document the expectation here at least, for this and the other SDF methods. eg. SplitRestriction(K?, V, RT) []RT ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
