robertwb commented on code in PR #30317:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/30317#discussion_r1498106140
##########
model/fn-execution/src/main/proto/org/apache/beam/model/fn_execution/v1/beam_fn_api.proto:
##########
@@ -1075,6 +1111,42 @@ message StateClearRequest {}
// A response to clear state.
message StateClearResponse {}
+// A message describes a sort key range [start, end).
+message OrderedListRange {
+ int64 start = 1;
+ int64 end = 2;
+}
+
+// A data entry which is tagged with a sort key.
+message OrderedListEntry {
+ int64 sort_key = 1;
+ bytes data = 2;
+}
+
+// This request will fetch an ordered list with a sort key range. If the
+// timestamp range is not specified, the runner should use [MIN_INT64,
+// MAX_INT64) by default.
+message OrderedListStateGetRequest {
+ bytes continuation_token = 1;
Review Comment:
Yes, that's what I meant by mutually exclusive. If we allow providing both,
we have to figure out what to do when they disagree, and there's no good
usecase for that.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
