yyy1000 commented on code in PR #10494:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10494#discussion_r1602098819
##########
datafusion/optimizer/src/propagate_empty_relation.rs:
##########
@@ -154,14 +156,14 @@ impl OptimizerRule for PropagateEmptyRelation {
Ok(Transformed::yes(LogicalPlan::Projection(
Projection::new_from_schema(
Arc::new(child),
- plan.schema().clone(),
+ input_schema.clone(),
),
)))
}
} else {
Ok(Transformed::yes(LogicalPlan::Union(Union {
inputs: new_inputs,
- schema: union.schema.clone(),
+ schema: input_schema.clone(),
Review Comment:
Yes, I understand you.
But for solution 1, like I said in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10494#discussion_r1600567694, the
merged schema would use the `left_qualifier` in line 1395 - 1396, i.e. the
first LogicalPlan's.
```
left_qualifier.cloned(),
Arc::new(Field::new(left_field.name(), data_type, nullable)),
```
However, I'm not quiet clear how to set the correct qualifier, they are
different due to a `SubqueryAlias`🤔. Choosing either one would make some case
failed. 😞
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]