gstvg commented on code in PR #21193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/21193#discussion_r3222815271
##########
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/producer/expr/scalar_function.rs:
##########
@@ -35,7 +38,68 @@ pub fn from_higher_order_function(
fun: &expr::HigherOrderFunction,
schema: &DFSchemaRef,
) -> datafusion::common::Result<Expression> {
- from_function(producer, fun.name(), &fun.args, schema)
+ let mut lambda_parameters = fun.lambda_parameters(schema)?.into_iter();
+
+ let num_lambdas = fun
+ .args
+ .iter()
+ .filter(|arg| matches!(arg, Expr::Lambda(_)))
+ .count();
+
+ if lambda_parameters.len() != num_lambdas {
+ return substrait_err!(
+ "{} returned {} lambdas but {num_lambdas} expected",
+ fun.name(),
+ lambda_parameters.len()
+ );
+ }
+
+ let arguments = fun
+ .args
+ .iter()
+ .map(|arg| {
+ let arg = match arg {
+ Expr::Lambda(l) => {
+ let lambda_parameters =
+ lambda_parameters.next().ok_or_else(|| {
+ internal_datafusion_err!(
+ "lambda_parameters len should have been
checked above"
+ )
+ })?;
+
+ let named_lambda_parameters =
+ std::iter::zip(&l.params, lambda_parameters)
Review Comment:
Is a error if the expression define more parameters (`l.params`) than the
function reports as supported (`lambda_parameters`), thanks
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/21193/changes/347bf129d7a5f1c4aad1b45f848045b9752cc57a
The inverse just means that not all supported parameters were used
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
