gabotechs commented on code in PR #24826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/24826#discussion_r3901965842


##########
datafusion/proto/src/physical_plan/mod.rs:
##########
@@ -2058,6 +2078,146 @@ impl PhysicalExtensionCodec for 
ComposedPhysicalExtensionCodec {
     }
 }
 
+/// A PhysicalExtensionCodec that tries one of multiple inner codecs until one 
works.
+/// The name of the codec that successfully encoded an [`ExecutionPlan`] is 
stored in the
+/// encoded payload, and the codec with that exact name will be used for 
decoding.
+#[derive(Default, Debug)]
+pub struct ComposedNamedPhysicalExtensionCodec {
+    codecs: HashMap<Cow<'static, str>, Arc<dyn PhysicalExtensionCodec>>,
+}

Review Comment:
   I don't think abuse is a worry here, as the provided `String` name is not 
un-sanitized input coming from the outside. Of course a developer can go crazy 
and provide an unreasonably long string here out of malice, but they can do 
that as well while serializing their custom plans, so it's not really a new 
risk.
   
   My guess is that adding ~30 bytes worth of a string should not bee too bad, 
because this only affects custom nodes provided by users, not each node in the 
plan, so it should be negligible.
   
   > If you consider sorted keys, you can implement codec priority as well
   
   :thinking: this sounds interesting, but I don't understand it very well. How 
would this priority mechanism work?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to