viirya commented on PR #11977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/11977#issuecomment-2297093270

   > @viirya seems to suggest this would be a good change, but @jayzhan211 
points out this change would mean anyone who built `PhysicalExpr`s without a 
corresponding `Expr` would have to create their own schema names
   
   Hmm, as we built physical operators directly (without going through analysis 
stage in DataFusion), we manually bind all columns. Do we still have additional 
name resolution in physical stage in DataFusion?
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to