wugeer commented on code in PR #1472:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1472#discussion_r1822585946
##########
src/parser/mod.rs:
##########
@@ -2800,11 +2814,40 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
format: None,
})
} else if Token::ExclamationMark == tok {
- // PostgreSQL factorial operation
- Ok(Expr::UnaryOp {
- op: UnaryOperator::PGPostfixFactorial,
- expr: Box::new(expr),
- })
+ if self.dialect.supports_factorial_operator() {
+ match expr {
+ Expr::Value(_) | Expr::Identifier(_) | Expr::Nested(_) |
Expr::BinaryOp{..} => Ok(Expr::UnaryOp {
+ op: UnaryOperator::PGPostfixFactorial,
+ expr: Box::new(expr),
+ }),
+ _ => {
+ self.expected(
+ "Value or Identifier or Nested or BinaryOp struct
before factorial operator(!)", self.peek_token())
Review Comment:
Yes, you're right. After testing, returning `Ok(Expr::UnaryOp ...)` directly
here doesn't affect the result.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
