buraksenn commented on PR #13201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13201#issuecomment-2451704154

   > > It got pretty out of hand because of nth_value and BuiltinWindowFunction 
references across the repo so I wanted to open a draft PR to get feedback.
   > 
   > I personally think it would be fine to leave `BuiltInWindowFunction` 
initially while we port over the function, and them remove it as a follow on PR
   > 
   > Perhaps you can leave a stub in like
   > 
   > ```rust
   > enum BuiltInWindowFunction {
   >   // Never created, will be removed in a follow on PR
   >   Stub
   > };
   > ```
   > 
   > Then we can focus this PR on making sure that `nth_value` is working as a 
user defined function and then move on in the next PR to mechanically ripping 
out the old BuiltInWindowFunction
   
   Thanks @alamb will continue with what you've said


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to