aharpervc commented on code in PR #1810:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1810#discussion_r2068726100


##########
src/dialect/mssql.rs:
##########
@@ -215,6 +218,78 @@ impl MsSqlDialect {
         }))
     }
 
+    /// Parse a SQL CREATE statement
+    fn parse_create(&self, parser: &mut Parser) -> Option<Result<Statement, 
ParserError>> {
+        let original_index = parser.index();
+
+        if !parser.parse_keyword(Keyword::CREATE) {
+            parser.set_index(original_index);

Review Comment:
   Great, I'll drop the maybe_parse commit & update the implementation to this 
two branch approach. I think that will meet both our expectations for the time 
being.
   
   A pro/con on that iteration will be that the dialect implementation of 
parse_statement is mixing peek & parse strategies in that function, which seems 
unfortunate. However further refactoring it to consolidate strategies seems 
outside the scope of the branch.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to