jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16443#discussion_r2182837993


##########
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/utils.rs:
##########
@@ -843,24 +844,56 @@ pub(crate) fn apply_join_filter_to_indices(
     probe_indices: UInt32Array,
     filter: &JoinFilter,
     build_side: JoinSide,
+    max_intermediate_size: Option<usize>,
 ) -> Result<(UInt64Array, UInt32Array)> {
     if build_indices.is_empty() && probe_indices.is_empty() {
         return Ok((build_indices, probe_indices));
     };
 
-    let intermediate_batch = build_batch_from_indices(
-        filter.schema(),
-        build_input_buffer,
-        probe_batch,
-        &build_indices,
-        &probe_indices,
-        filter.column_indices(),
-        build_side,
-    )?;
-    let filter_result = filter
-        .expression()
-        .evaluate(&intermediate_batch)?
-        .into_array(intermediate_batch.num_rows())?;
+    let filter_result = if let Some(max_size) = max_intermediate_size {

Review Comment:
   Yes but I believe this removes the purpose of the pull request if we are 
building the entire amount of indices? I may be missing something though



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to