BlakeOrth commented on issue #17211: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17211#issuecomment-3272495930
If we'd like to move forward with some initial plans or implementations I'm happy to contribute in whatever way I can to help move the effort forward, just let me know what would be the most helpful. My personal approach would be to start with normalizing the code paths between flat vs partitioned tables so any existing/future caching work can apply to both without additional work or furthering the discrepancies between the two. However, given some list caching infrastructure already exists, I could also see justification for building out a default listing cache first. Based on my current code exploration I don't think the two are very entwined, so it's possible the efforts could proceed as parallel efforts with minimal conflicts. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
