gene-bordegaray commented on code in PR #18673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/18673#discussion_r2528081004
##########
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_distribution.rs:
##########
@@ -1424,19 +1424,19 @@ fn multi_smj_joins() -> Result<()> {
// Should include 6 RepartitionExecs (3 hash, 3
round-robin), 3 SortExecs
JoinType::Inner | JoinType::Left | JoinType::LeftSemi |
JoinType::LeftAnti => {
assert_plan!(plan_distrib, @r"
-SortMergeJoin: join_type=..., on=[(a@0, c@2)]
- SortMergeJoin: join_type=..., on=[(a@0, b1@1)]
- SortExec: expr=[a@0 ASC], preserve_partitioning=[true]
- RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([a@0], 10), input_partitions=1
- DataSourceExec: file_groups={1 group: [[x]]}, projection=[a, b, c, d,
e], file_type=parquet
- SortExec: expr=[b1@1 ASC], preserve_partitioning=[true]
- RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([b1@1], 10), input_partitions=1
- ProjectionExec: expr=[a@0 as a1, b@1 as b1, c@2 as c1, d@3 as d1, e@4
as e1]
- DataSourceExec: file_groups={1 group: [[x]]}, projection=[a, b, c,
d, e], file_type=parquet
- SortExec: expr=[c@2 ASC], preserve_partitioning=[true]
- RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([c@2], 10), input_partitions=1
- DataSourceExec: file_groups={1 group: [[x]]}, projection=[a, b, c, d,
e], file_type=parquet
-");
+ SortMergeJoin: join_type=..., on=[(a@0, c@2)]
+ SortMergeJoin: join_type=..., on=[(a@0, b1@1)]
+ SortExec: expr=[a@0 ASC],
preserve_partitioning=[true]
+ RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([a@0], 10),
input_partitions=1, maintains_sort_order=true
+ DataSourceExec: file_groups={1 group: [[x]]},
projection=[a, b, c, d, e], file_type=parquet
+ SortExec: expr=[b1@1 ASC],
preserve_partitioning=[true]
+ RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([b1@1], 10),
input_partitions=1, maintains_sort_order=true
+ ProjectionExec: expr=[a@0 as a1, b@1 as b1,
c@2 as c1, d@3 as d1, e@4 as e1]
+ DataSourceExec: file_groups={1 group:
[[x]]}, projection=[a, b, c, d, e], file_type=parquet
Review Comment:
I think the wording maintains_sort_order is misleading. Here the order is
being maintained in the repartition but there just is no sort order to begin
with. A good condition to check that may give us the results we want is if the
`RepartitionExec`'s child has an output_requirement
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
