gabotechs commented on code in PR #19379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/19379#discussion_r2632154456
##########
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/hash_join/partitioned_hash_eval.rs:
##########
@@ -206,13 +259,15 @@ impl Hash for HashTableLookupExpr {
fn hash<H: std::hash::Hasher>(&self, state: &mut H) {
self.hash_expr.dyn_hash(state);
self.description.hash(state);
+ Arc::as_ptr(&self.hash_map).hash(state);
}
}
impl PartialEq for HashTableLookupExpr {
fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
- Arc::ptr_eq(&self.hash_expr, &other.hash_expr)
+ self.hash_expr.as_ref() == other.hash_expr.as_ref()
&& self.description == other.description
+ && Arc::ptr_eq(&self.hash_map, &other.hash_map)
Review Comment:
Yeah, it looks correct to compare the pointer addresses today. I wonder how
that decision will age though, if in the future someone starts relying on
actual hash table comparison by value, do you think that can silently be
rendered into a bug?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
