Em 01-09-2011 09:53, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.ro...@gmail.com <mailto:rr.ro...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Em 31-08-2011 11 <tel:31-08-2011%2011>:15, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
    escreveu:
    - Is it necessary to kill with the KILL signal when stopping the
    Rots server (slow_tests.rake line 15)?
    That wasn't my first trial. I tried "HUP" first, but I was getting
    an exception so I gave up and used KILL instead. If you could make
    it work with HUP, great.


Ah, okay. I would think INT would be a better suited signal; that's what Ctrl-C sends, afaik.HUP is often used to ask a process to reload it's configuration.

Ok, my fault here. I thought HUP was the Ctrl+C :P I'll try INT then.



    - Since we already have a rake/ruby process running, could we use
    a Rake task for running the tests (test:slow:run)?
    I think it should be possible to do something like:

      Rake::TestTask.new("slow_tests") do |test|
        test.pattern = "test/slow/*.rb"
      end

      task :run => [:start, :slow_tests] do
        stop
      end

    ?


    Sorry, I'm not that good in Rake. Could you explains in details
    what you're willing to achieve? I still didn't understand what you
    are asking for (or suggesting)...


Rake includes tasks for running test files directly, without shelling out to Ruby manually (the Rake::TestTask class). Absolutely no biggie, just less code.

Ok, I got it, I'll try to change it too.



    These are personal opinions only, feel free to ignore them :-)

    I love personal opinions! :) I never ignore them :)


In that case, let's discuss football :-)

Not a good day. Flamengo lost yesterday night in Brazilian most famous soccer championship, jumping from 2ē to 5th :( The opponent was one of the latest in Ranking... That is the third match that Flamengo lost this year and the second one in this championship. But we draw a lot!

    Also, I'd like to take the chance to better understand what you
    would like me to work on from now on. Is there any other gem not
    supported by Rails 3.1?

    I want to make sure we don't have any other dependency before
    start porting Gitorious to Rails 3.1...


Did we discuss the routing issues in Gitorious at all on the list? Whether to keep the somewhat complex routing logic we have...

I'm not sure if we discussed that a lot. Just some comments about it among other topics. It would be great to start a new thread only at this topic.

I'm just not sure if it should be the next topic or if there is still some missing vendored plugin that should be unvendored before that...

Best!

--
To post to this group, send email to gitorious@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
gitorious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

Reply via email to